Latest content from Ingredients

Unlock Innovative Possibilities in Wet Pet Food Formulation with the Power of Faba Bean Protein
Proteins

4+ MIN

Unlock Innovative Possibilities in Wet Pet Food Formulation with the Power of Faba Bean Protein

Demand for wet pet food is on the rise, with the segment's growth being driven by pet owners looking for premium and nutritionally balanced pet food with good palatability.i At the same time, consumers increasingly want to see more plant-based offerings that also reflect their own sustainability values. In response to these evolving expectations, BENEO has conducted a new set of technical trials to explore the potential of its faba bean protein concentrate as a functional, plant-based ingredient for wet pet food.
Exploring Alternatives to Animal Blood Plasma
In premium and super-premium wet pet food, maintaining consistent product quality is essential. These products typically contain at least 50 wt% total moisture, and their quality is standardised and maintained through the addition of spray-dried animal blood plasma (ABP). This ingredient provides excellent texturizing and emulsifying properties but can come at a high cost. Moreover, due to its animal origin, ABP is increasingly perceived as undesirable by consumers who increasingly want more plant-based ingredient options for their pets.
  To address these challenges, BENEO initiated a series of technical trials in collaboration with Passion4Food, a specialist service provider for the pet food industry. The objective was to evaluate whether faba bean protein concentrate could be used as a suitable and cost-effective alternative to ABP in wet pet food formulations.
Technical Trials Confirm Strong Functional Performance
The initial trials investigated the performance of BENEO's faba bean protein concentrate when partially (50%) or fully (100%) replacing ABP in high-protein wet pet food loaves (paté format). The results showed that the ingredient could be successfully used for both full and partial ABP replacement, with no significant change in the end product's weight or texture. This means producers can maintain desired product quality while achieving considerable cost savings compared to ABP. Based on these promising results, BENEO carried out follow-up trials using a test recipe suitable for commercial scalability.  

As part of the following additional trials, the same percentages of ABP and faba bean protein concentrate were used and compared to a test recipe in which ABP was partially replaced at 50% with pea protein concentrate.
  The data demonstrated that BENEO's faba bean protein concentrate acted as an excellent and cost-effective alternative binder to ABP, with no significant changes observed in loaf height, weight, hardness, or adhesiveness. In contrast, the partial replacement of ABP with pea protein concentrate led to a significant decrease in hardness, indicating that faba bean protein concentrate provides a higher binding capacity in wet pet food loaves. This makes it a valuable ingredient for maintaining the desired texture of the end-product while reducing reliance on animal-derived binders.  
Patent Application Supports Scientific Innovation
Following these successful results, BENEO filed an international patent application for the use of faba bean protein concentrate as an alternative to spray-dried animal blood plasma in wet pet food. The patent application was published in August 2025, underscoring BENEO's dedication to research-based innovation and functional ingredient development for the pet food industry.
Nutritional and Formulation Advantages
Beyond its technical and cost benefits, BENEO's faba bean protein concentrate also provides strong nutritional value. With a protein content of 61 g per 100 g on a dry matter basis and an ileal digestibility score of almost 90%, it is a highly digestible source of protein. Its amino acid profile is relatively rich in lysine and can complement cereal proteins, such as rice protein or vital wheat gluten, to achieve a complete essential amino acids profile.

The ingredient also provides flexibility for product positioning. It is listed in the EU Catalogue of Feed Materialsii and can be used in formulations that carry 'no grain' claims.
Contributing to Sustainable and Locally Sourced Solutions
Sustainability has become an increasingly important consideration for both consumers and producers. BENEO's faba bean protein concentrate offers strong sustainability credentials linked to the faba bean crop and to BENEO's local sourcing and production processes in Germany. Local production in the new state-of-the-art pulse-processing plant, located in Obrigheim, further supports short transport distances, secures supply and reduces the environmental impact compared to more resource-intensive ingredients.
  Dr Maygane Ronsmans, Product Manager Animal Nutrition at BENEO, comments:

'With two in three pet owners considering plant-based proteins to be better for the environmentiii, demand has grown for sustainable and locally sourced vegetal protein ingredients. As the technical trials show, BENEO's faba bean protein concentrate offers pet food manufacturers a win-win scenario: producers can decrease their recipe costs while benefitting from secure supply and meeting consumer expectations for more sustainable and plant-based pet foods, without impacting the quality of the end-product.'
Supporting the Next Generation of Wet Pet Food Innovation
The findings from BENEO's trials confirm that faba bean protein concentrate combines functionality, nutritional quality and sustainability. It performs effectively as a binder in wet pet food, delivers a high level of digestible protein, and provides a viable alternative to animal blood plasma in applications where consistency and texture are key.
  For pet food manufacturers, this opens the door to new formulation strategies that balance technical performance, cost efficiency and environmental responsibility. As the market continues to evolve, ingredients such as BENEO's faba bean protein concentrate can help producers meet consumer expectations for more plant-based, locally sourced and high-quality products.
  Interested in learning more about BENEO's ingredient solutions? Find more details here  By BENEO
Source: All Pet Food Magazine References
i Wet Pet Food Market Analysis - Size, Share, and Forecast Outlook 2025 to 2035, Future Market Insights Inc, 2024. 
ii Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 of 16 January 2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials – Faba bean protein concentrate is listed under entry 3.7.5: 'Horse bean protein' 
iii BENEO Consumer Research On Pet Care 2025. FMCG Gurus conducted a quantitative online survey in 2025 with 2.500 pet owners in the US, Brazil, UK, Germany, and China (250 cat and 250 dog owners per country).

<strong>Colmax</strong>: Natural Choline for Neural, Metabolic, and Digestive Well-being in Pets
Functional Additives

3+ MIN

Colmax: Natural Choline for Neural, Metabolic, and Digestive Well-being in Pets

In companion animal nutrition, well-being begins long before food reaches the bowl. Ingredient quality and nutrient balance are key factors in sustaining the vitality and metabolic health of dogs and cats.

Among these nutrients, choline plays a fundamental role. Its presence in the diet contributes to proper liver function, lipid transport, and the development of the nervous system. Dogs and cats do not synthesize sufficient amounts on their own, making the inclusion of this ingredient essential.

Colmax is a natural source of choline and inositol developed by Adinnova to help regulate liver, lipid, and energy metabolism. Its plant-based formulation enables this essential nutrient to be incorporated into different pet food formulations in a stable and safe manner.  
Why Is Choline Key in Pet Nutrition?
Choline is involved in fundamental physiological processes, particularly liver metabolism, fat transport, and nervous system function. When dietary intake is insufficient, liver disorders, reduced vitality, or muscle weakness may occur.

Traditionally, the most widely used source of choline in animal nutrition has been choline chloride. However, this molecule presents certain technological limitations. It is a hygroscopic and reactive compound that can interact with other dietary ingredients, affecting the stability of sensitive nutrients during feed processing and storage. Among the most common effects are the oxidation of vitamins, pigments, and amino acids. Moreover, its origin is associated with petrochemical byproducts.

Natural sources of choline represent an alternative aimed at overcoming these limitations. Plant-based choline is associated with phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholine, which are in the cellular membrane structure and contribute to its biological stability.
Adinnova's Natural Choline
Adinnova's source of choline and inositol, Colmax, was developed to contribute to metabolic balance in animal nutrition. Its formulation combines plant-based choline with functional compounds that support cellular performance.

Its components include phospholipids, such as phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylinositol, as well as coadjuvants, for example, butyric acid and plant extracts, that support intestinal and liver health and nutrient absorption. This combination helps optimize lipid transport and utilization, helping metabolic balance and pet vitality through nutrition.

Another relevant characteristic is its technological stability. Colmax is a fluid, non-hygroscopic presentation that withstands the thermal treatments commonly used in pet food processing, as these molecules remain active and maintain absorption capacity. In turn, its use allows lower inclusion levels in the formula compared with synthetic choline sources, optimizing formulation efficiency and economic performance.
The Impact of Colmax in Pet Care
Colmax provides choline, a pseudovitamin that dogs and cats do not synthesize in sufficient amounts. Its presence in the diet helps reinforce the integrity of cell membranes and participate in neurometabolic processes linked to vitality and normal body function.

This nutritional additive supports the healthy development of the brain, heart, liver, muscles, and nervous system, contributing to the overall well-being of animals through nutrition.

Its stable formulation also allows easy incorporation into pet food. The recommended dosage in pet care ranges from 150 to 500 g/ton of feed, and it can replace choline chloride (60%) at an approximate ratio of 1-4, optimizing the use of space in the diet.

By supporting cellular function, Colmax helps sustain the vitality and well-being of dogs and cats throughout all life stages. Its nutritional contribution reinforces cell membrane integrity, supports neuronal development, and contributes to pets' overall health.
Studies on Colmax
This biosolution has been supported by scientific evaluations aimed at understanding its effect on animal metabolism. During 2024 and 2025, Adinnova carried out studies in collaboration with the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) to analyze productive, metabolic, and physiological parameters, including performance, liver function, and tissue analysis. The results validated the contribution of Colmax as a nutritional additive that supports the general well-being of animals.  
Gene expression studies were also conducted using advanced sequencing technologies to observe how the organism responds to its inclusion in the diet. Analyses have shown that Colmax modulates several metabolic pathways linked to nutrient utilization and cellular energy production.

Lower activation of genes associated with cell proliferation processes was observed. When dysregulated, these mechanisms are often linked to different pathologies, including tumor processes such as cancer. In other words, Colmax supports an active and balanced metabolism without stimulating cellular mechanisms associated with uncontrolled proliferation. By Adinnova
Source: All Pet Food Magazine

About Adinnova
Adinnova is an Argentine company, present in international markets, dedicated to the development of natural additives for animal nutrition. Each biosolution integrates science and innovation applied to wellbeing and productivity.

More information on our website: adinnova.com.ar
 

Grain-Free Pet Food for Cats and Dogs
 
Vegetable Origin

4+ MIN

Grain-Free Pet Food for Cats and Dogs  

WHAT ARE 'GRAIN-FREE' PET FOODS?
Pet foods that are sold as 'grain-free' typically do not contain grains. Grain-free foods typically contain ingredients such as pulses including beans, chickpeas, and lentils, and can also include tubers (e.g., potatoes). More recently, grain free pet foods have become a popular feeding choice for some pet owners.
  WHAT ARE GRAINS?
Grains (cereals) are a group of ingredients that contain mainly starch as well as varying amounts of protein, fibre, lipids, vitamins, and minerals and are used in pet foods. Grain examples include rice, corn, wheat, barley, sorghum and oats.   WHAT ARE PULSES?
Pulses are defined as the dried edible seeds of plants in the legume family1. Examples of pulses include dried beans, broad beans/faba beans, peas, chickpeas/garbanzo beans, and lentils. Pulses contain starch (typically at levels lower than cereals) as well as protein (at levels higher than cereals), fibre and some lipids, vitamins and minerals.   DOES 'GRAIN-FREE' MEAN CARBOHYDRATE FREE?
Carbohydrates, which include starches and fibres, are an important source of energy and promote digestive health. Carbohydrates are present in ingredients typically found in 'grain-free' recipes for instance in pulses (e.g., beans, chickpeas, lentils, etc.), potatoes, and sweet potatoes.

Starch plays a crucial role in the manufacture of dry pet food. For more information about the role of carbohydrates in pet food see the FEDIAF factsheet on carbohydrates2.
  WHAT IS GLUTEN AND WHERE DO YOU FIND IT?
Gluten is a type of protein. It is found in some cereal grains (wheat, barley, and rye). Gluten can be used to bind items together, such as in bread. Gluten is composed of two main proteins – glutenin and gliadin, with gliadin making up 70% of the protein content. Wheat gluten intolerance is very rare in dogs and has not been reported in cats. It is recommended to consult with your veterinarian if you think your pet could benefit from a gluten-free diet. There are many ingredients commonly believed to contain gluten that are actually gluten-free, including quinoa, buckwheat, rice, millet, and maize (corn).   ARE 'GRAIN-FREE' PET FOODS HEALTHIER?
The most important consideration when deciding what diet to feed is whether it provides complete and balanced nutrition. If there is too much of one nutrient and not enough of others, it will impact the pet's health. This principle is true regardless of whether the pet food contains grain or not.
  The best way to ensure a healthy diet is to feed a complete food appropriate to the pet and their life stage. Your veterinary health care team can help select an adequate food for each case. For those that prefer grain-free pet food, there is a good selection of products on the market.   ARE 'GRAIN-FREE' DIETS BETTER FOR PETS WITH ALLERGIES?
While adverse reactions to food do occur in pets, the true prevalence of dietary intolerance or allergy in pets is unknown but thought to be rare. Reports vary, however one review found that cutaneous adverse food reactions (CAFR) – which include allergies as well as intolerances – have a prevalence of between 1-2% of dogs and 0.2% of cats, presented to veterinarians3. It is important to remember that not all allergies are linked to food e.g., fleabite allergy, and it is important to investigate all potential causes with your veterinarian.
  Whilst a very small number of pets, like humans, may be intolerant or allergic to a particular grain, this does not mean that other grains are not tolerated, that all pets will be affected, or that any one grain is inherently bad for the health of pets.
  Available research has highlighted that the most common proven allergens for cats and dogs are protein sources and include beef, chicken, fish, and dairy products4. Owners concerned about dietary intolerances or allergies should always speak to their veterinarian. It is important to work closely with your veterinarian to determine the cause of your pet's allergy. An allergic response can occur to any protein, including those contained in cereals and pulses. Specialized diets are available that are designed for the reduction of food intolerances and allergies.   ARE 'GRAIN-FREE' DIETS LINKED TO HEART PROBLEMS IN DOGS?
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) opened an investigation into the occurrence of non-hereditary dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in dogs in 2018, when they noted an association between reported cases of DCM and some diets containing a very high proportion of pulses and/or potatoes5,6. Diets reported included both 'grain-free' and grain-containing formulations. In some cases of DCM, a change in diet is part of the treatment as it can result in clinical improvement. Research to examine a potential cause has been inconclusive to date.
  The FDA is also continuing to explore the role of genetics, underlying medical conditions, and/or other factors in DCM. The FDA did not recall any products at any time. In December 2022, FDA issued a statement saying that it does not intend to release further public updates on DCM and diets until there is meaningful new scientific information to share.
  If you have any questions relating to DCM it is recommended that you talk to your veterinarian. Source: FEDIAF
  References
Ingredient Definitions | IPIC – International Pulse Ingredient Consortium (pulseingredients.com). ↩︎
Carbohydrates in dog and cat food | FEDIAF (europeanpetfood.org) ↩︎
Olivry T, Mueller RS. Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (3): prevalence of cutaneous adverse food reactions in dogs and cats. BMC Vet Res. 2017 Feb;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-0973-z. PMID: 28202060; PMCID: PMC5311844. ↩︎
Mueller RS, Olivry T, Prélaud P. Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (2): common food allergen sources in dogs and cats. BMC Vet Res. 2016 Jan 12;12:9. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0633-8. PMID: 26753610; PMCID: PMC4710035. ↩︎
FDA Investigation into Potential Link between Certain Diets and Canine Dilated Cardiomyopathy | FDA ↩︎
Questions & Answers: FDA's Work on Potential Causes of Non-Hereditary DCM in Dogs | FDA ↩︎

The Supplement Problem No One Is Talking About
 
Functional Additives

9+ MIN

The Supplement Problem No One Is Talking About  

A recent study published made me sit with that question a little harder. In the study, researchers tested 70 over-the-counter canine and feline dietary supplements purchased from a major online retailer, analyzing each for five essential minerals and 12 heavy metals. They also compared actual mineral concentrations to label claims for any product that made them.
  The headline finding is that none of the supplements exceeded the National Research Council (NRC) Maximum Tolerable Levels (MTLs) for any mineral, including the heavy metals tested. That's worth saying, because this isn't a product safety recall story. But when you read past the headline, the bigger picture is more complicated and more relevant to anyone building or scaling in this category.   What the Data Actually Shows   Across all 70 products, the researchers recorded 376 heavy-metal detections. Only one product contained no detectable heavy metals. Every other product in the study (69 out of 70) had at least one.
  The most prevalent heavy metal was nickel, found in 66 of 70 products (94.3%), followed by barium in 64 products (91.4%) and vanadium in 61 products (87.1%). Lead was detected in 16 supplements (22.9%), with concentrations of up to 3.7 mg/kg. Cadmium was detected in 10 products (14.3%), with concentrations up to 1.5 mg/kg. Arsenic was found in 19 products (27.1%).
  These aren't trace amounts you have to squint to find. They're present because heavy metals enter the supply chain through natural mineral contamination of raw ingredients, including soil, water, and plant material. Without robust ingredient specification and testing, they pass straight through into the finished product.
  One finding in particular stuck with me. A product explicitly marketed for liver support, with claims to help the animal's body avoid exposure to heavy metals, contained five detectable heavy metals: vanadium, chromium, cobalt, nickel, and barium. That's not a safety violation; it's a credibility problem. And it illustrates what can happen when formulation and quality control aren't working in sync, and why heavy metal testing needs to be a deliberate, standalone part of a brand's quality program. Guaranteed analyses and standard label claim verification don't screen for heavy metals. That requires proactive, targeted testing at the ingredient and finished-product levels, something most brands aren't doing unless they've built it explicitly into their quality protocols.     The Selenium Story Is Its Own Warning   The essential mineral findings deserve their own attention. Selenium is an essential nutrient, but it has one of the narrowest margins of safety of any mineral in companion animal nutrition. The selenium maximum for dogs set by the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) is 2 mg/kg dry matter, which isn't far above the minimum required amount of .35 mg/kg. The present study found selenium in 52 of 70 products (74.3%), with concentrations up to 14 mg/kg supplement, as-fed.
  What matters is that selenium was only declared as an added ingredient in 10 of those 52 products. The other 42 contained selenium that pet owners, and probably most formulators, would have no reason to expect to be there.
  The authors flag a specific scenario worth thinking through. If a small dog or cat is consuming a primary diet that meets the AAFCO selenium minimum and is also receiving a supplement containing meaningful selenium concentrations, the total daily intake can exceed the AAFCO maximum. The concern scales upward for smaller animals because supplement dosing is based on body weight, but calorie requirements, and therefore primary food intake, scale to metabolic body weight. A 4.5-kg cat consuming a selenium-containing supplement at the label dose can end up in a different risk category than a 30-kg dog consuming the same product.
  And then there's the stacking question. The authors cite a survey in which 66% of dogs receiving supplements were receiving more than one supplement simultaneously. Their analysis assumed a single supplement was being used. Add a second or third product, and the cumulative mineral picture changes meaningfully.   The Miss Rate Is Real   The label accuracy findings are worth noting, too. Of the 18 products that made quantitative claims for one or more of the minerals analyzed, eight of them (44%) failed to meet at least one label claim. Of those eight, 87.5% were multivitamin/mineral supplements.
  Of the 53 total label claims across those products, 77.4% were met or exceeded. That sounds reasonably good until you look at what 'exceeded' sometimes means: seven products had detected concentrations of at least 200% of the claimed content. One contained 331% of its claimed iron. Another contained 443% of its claimed zinc. On the other hand, three products had less than 60% of the claimed content for at least one mineral.
  Those numbers matter beyond the spreadsheet. Chronic excess zinc intake in dogs can cause hemolytic anemia, liver and pancreatic damage, and acute kidney failure. The tricky part is that supplement-sourced overexposure tends to creep up slowly. A pet owner who's diligently giving their dog a daily joint chew has no reason to suspect the product is delivering more than four times the zinc on the label. By the time clinical signs appear, the damage may already be underway. On the flip side, three products had less than 60% of their claimed content for at least one mineral, meaning some pets aren't getting anywhere near the therapeutic dose the supplement was purchased to deliver.
  This isn't a new problem. Research has documented label inaccuracies in pet supplements for years. One study found that 84% of chondroitin sulfate products deviated from their label claims, with deviations ranging from 0% to 115%. What the present study adds is current, systematic data across a broader supplement category.
  The practical takeaway is straightforward. A label claim is not a quality assurance system. It's a starting point that requires independent verification to be meaningful.   The Feline Problem Within the Problem   Something the study surfaces quietly, but that deserves louder attention in our industry, is that we don't have species-specific MTL data for cats. The NRC has established canine MTL values only for cadmium and lead. For cats, there are no NRC MTL values for any of the minerals analyzed in this study. The researchers had to apply the same MTL values to both cat and dog data, and where species-specific values didn't exist, they used MTL derived from rodents, poultry, or swine.
  The authors are candid about the limitations. For cats, they note that comparisons to omnivore livestock species are particularly weak because cats are obligate carnivores. Better reference points might be mink or other fur-bearing carnivores, for which essentially no data on tolerable levels exist.
  This matters for two reasons. First, cats metabolize many compounds differently from dogs, which means that certain compounds clear more slowly, while chronic low-level exposures can accumulate in ways that wouldn't be predicted from dog or human data. Second, the cat supplement segment is growing faster than any other pet type in the category. MarketsandMarkets projects a 9.1% CAGR for cat supplements through 2030. Increased use of feline supplements against a backdrop of inadequate feline-specific safety data is a dangerous combination that the industry should be paying attention to.   Why NASC Matters   This is the part of the conversation I want to spend more time on. And I'll be honest, quality claims in the pet supplement space can feel like shades of grey. 'Tested,' 'verified,' 'third-party certified' get applied so loosely that they've largely lost meaning. That credibility gap is real and worth naming. What separates a genuine quality infrastructure from a marketing badge is whether it creates verifiable, auditable accountability at the points where things actually go wrong: ingredient sourcing, manufacturing consistency, label accuracy, and post-market safety surveillance.
  The National Animal Supplement Council (NASC) Quality Seal is consistently misunderstood as a marketing badge rather than a quality-infrastructure requirement. However, the supplement findings in this study are exactly the failure modes the NASC process is designed to catch. It cannot be prevented entirely, because no system eliminates all risk, but it can detect, track, and correct.
  To earn the NASC Quality Seal, a company must pass a comprehensive independent third-party audit, a process that typically takes about four months from start to finish. The audit covers documented standard operating procedures for production process controls, labeling compliance against NASC guidelines, and verification that products are registered in the NASC adverse event reporting database. The audit certificate must be renewed every two years; there's no grandfathering. Companies must also pass random independent product testing to verify that what's on the label is what's in the product.
  Run the study findings through that framework. Selenium showing up undeclared in 74% of products? That's an ingredient specification and testing failure that an audit-ready quality control system would catch. A product claiming 443% of its labeled zinc? That's a batch-level manufacturing inconsistency that random independent testing would surface. A liver support product containing multiple heavy metals despite marketing language around metal avoidance? That's a formulation and claims review failure that NASC's labeling compliance process exists to prevent.
  None of this means NASC certification guarantees perfection, but it creates accountability structures that the unregulated default does not.   The Business Case for Getting This Right   Here's what I've seen work when working with supplement brands at different stages. Quality infrastructure tends to get treated as a later-stage problem. First, you build the product, establish distribution, and prove the market, then you worry about audits and SOPs. That sequencing creates real downstream risk.
  Veterinary channel access is increasingly quality-credential-dependent. Retailers are asking harder questions about third-party testing, and the conversation happening in the research community right now will reach the retail floor and the veterinary exam room faster than most brands anticipate.
  There's also a differentiation argument that isn't made often enough. This study, and the broader literature it builds on, create a genuinely useful commercial conversation for any brand that has done the work. In a market where 69 out of 70 randomly selected products contain at least one detectable heavy metal and nearly half of quantitative label claims on multivitamin products don't fully hold up, transparency is a competitive position. A brand that can point to its NASC audit certificate, its independent testing Certificates of Analysis (CoAs), and its ingredient-level heavy metal specifications is telling a fundamentally different quality story than one that can't.
  The challenge, and I hear this regularly, is that building the quality infrastructure and the product simultaneously, while managing a launch, feels overwhelming. But, it doesn't have to be. The NASC audit process is structured and learnable. Ingredient specification development and supplier qualification don't require a large internal team if you're approaching them systematically. And the investment in getting it right early is considerably smaller than the cost of fixing it later.   What I'd Be Asking If I Were You   If you're currently selling supplements: When did you last run independent testing on your current formulations? Does your CoA come from your manufacturer or from an independent lab? Do you have heavy metal specifications written into your ingredient purchasing agreements?
  If you're developing a new supplement line: Are your formulation decisions and your quality control (QC) infrastructure decisions happening in parallel, or sequentially? Have you mapped your label claims against independent verification?
  If you're thinking about the feline category specifically: Are you applying dog-centric safety assumptions to a species that metabolizes compounds meaningfully differently, with essentially no species-specific tolerable level data to lean on?
  This study doesn't say the sky is falling. It says we're building a multi-billion-dollar category on a quality foundation that hasn't been fully validated. The data to start asking harder questions is now clearly in the literature. The frameworks to start answering them, starting with NASC, already exist.
  The questions this study raises don't have easy answers, but they do provide a starting point. If you want to go deeper into the regulatory and quality aspects of supplement formulation, BSM Partners' team recently covered much of this ground in our podcast episode "Wrangling the Wild West of Pet Supplements" with Dr. Stephanie Clark and Jordan Tyler. And if your brand is actively navigating supplement quality, NASC audit readiness, or label compliance, that's exactly the kind of work our FSQAR practice was built for. We help clients build the quality infrastructure that makes those questions answerable, before they become problems. By Neeley Bowden Lewis
Source: BSM Partners

Inflexible Formulations: What Vitamin & Amino Acid Supply Disruption Could Mean for Pet Food
 
Vitamins

3+ MIN

Inflexible Formulations: What Vitamin & Amino Acid Supply Disruption Could Mean for Pet Food  

Recent discussions around vitamin and amino acid supply chains highlight a critical issue: these nutrients are not optional in pet food. Like the animal protein sector, they are foundational to animal health, but for pet food they are also integral to product integrity and regulatory compliance. For the pet food sector, even small disruptions can have outsized impacts.   The Nutritional and Formulation Challenge
Pet food is governed by strict nutrient requirements. In the U.S., dog and cat foods must meet defined nutrient profiles that specify minimum levels of essential vitamins and amino acids per pound of product. This means formulation is not simply about substituting ingredients; it is about maintaining precise nutritional balance. When supply disruptions occur, nutritionists are forced into complex reformulation decisions, which I describe as, 'solving a Rubik's Cube' -- adjusting one component inevitably affects multiple others. 
  Ingredient shifts can alter digestion, stability and overall product performance. When key vitamins or amino acids become scarce, manufacturers may need to modify formulations, and those changes carry real risk. Nutrient imbalances may impact gut health, skin and coat quality or long-term wellness. Changes in ingredient composition can also affect palatability and food intake, which pet owners will quickly notice. At the same time, reformulations may jeopardize label claims, certifications or even patented formulations. 
  Pets, particularly cats, have unique nutritional requirements that heighten the stakes of supply disruption. Taurine, for example, is essential for cats, and inadequate levels can lead to serious health conditions such as dilated cardiomyopathy. Nutrient interactions, such as those involving thiamine and amino acid balance, can create cascading formulation challenges. Certain dog breeds also require careful amino acid fortification to avoid health complications. These sensitivities mean that even temporary shortages can have real biological consequences if not managed carefully. 
  The risks become even more pronounced in veterinary therapeutic diets, which are designed as part of a broader health management plan; for example, renal diets for kidney support. When supply disruptions force the use of alternative or endogenous nutrient sources, unintended consequences may arise, including the introduction of unwanted co-nutrients, reduced bioavailability or conflicts with the intended therapeutic outcome. In these cases, formulation changes are not just technical, they are clinical decisions with direct implications for animal health. 
  Alternative ingredient strategies often rely on endogenous sources or complex co-products. While these can help bridge supply gaps, they introduce new uncertainties around nutrient availability, digestibility and additional nutrients that must be managed. In pet food, even small ingredient swaps can significantly alter the overall formula, increasing the risk to product design and performance.    A Supply Chain Issue with System-Wide Implications
One of the most important realities is that pet food does not operate in isolation. The same supply chains that support livestock production and human nutrition also supply companion animal diets. 
  As a result, disruptions in vitamin and amino acid production affect multiple sectors simultaneously. Increased costs or limited availability upstream in protein production ultimately translate into higher costs and tighter constraints downstream in pet food. This interconnectedness underscores a broader point: pet food is part of a larger food security system in North America. 
  While rising costs are a concern, the more fundamental challenge is maintaining supply stability. Pet food formulations are not easily or frequently changed due to regulatory requirements, labeling and packaging constraints, product claims and certifications and intellectual property considerations. Because of these constraints, the industry cannot simply adjust on the fly. Stability in ingredient supply is essential to maintaining consistent, safe and compliant products. 
  Ensuring a stable supply of vitamins and amino acids is critical to the future of the pet food industry. This will require coordinated efforts across agriculture, ingredient manufacturing and regulatory systems. Without that stability, the industry faces increasing pressure on formulation integrity, product performance and ultimately animal health. 
  The question is not just how to respond to disruption, but how to build a more resilient supply chain that supports pets, producers, and consumers alike.  Source: IFEEDER


Proteins

Proteins Rethinking Protein in Pet Nutrition: From Traditional Sources to Alternative and Functional Proteins

8+ MIN

Rethinking Protein in Pet Nutrition: From Traditional Sources to Alternative and Functional Proteins

In recent years, however, the discussion around protein has expanded significantly. Terms such as 'alternative proteins', 'novel proteins', and 'functional proteins' are increasingly used across the food and pet food industries. Much of this interest is driven by sustainability concerns and projections that global demand for protein will increase substantially as the human population approaches 10 billion by 2050 (FAO, 2022; OECD-FAO, 2023).
  This raises an important question: do we truly need entirely new protein sources to feed our pets, or should we focus on improving how we utilize the protein sources we already have?
  The answer likely lies somewhere in between. Traditional protein sources remain nutritionally robust, while emerging technologies and alternative ingredients offer opportunities to improve sustainability, functionality, and health outcomes—including effects on the gut microbiome.
Global Protein Demand and the Sustainability Debate   Projections toward 2050 suggest that global protein demand will rise sharply as the world population approaches 10 billion, with food demand expected to increase by about 60% (FAO 2018; FAO 2022; Henchion et al., 2017). At the same time, the global pet population continues to expand, with an estimated 900 million dogs and cats worldwide. Approximately 60% of these animals are concentrated in Europe, the United States, China, and Brazil.
  These trends have raised concerns about whether traditional livestock production alone can meet future protein needs. Critics often argue that feeding animal-derived proteins to pets competes with the human food supply and contributes to environmental pressures, such as land use, greenhouse gas emissions, and water consumption.
  However, the picture is more nuanced. A significant portion of animal-derived ingredients used in pet foods originates from rendered co-products of the human food system, including organ meats, trimmings, and fish processing residues. These ingredients represent an efficient form of nutrient recycling within the food supply chain (Boland et al., 2013).
  Advances in food processing technologies are also improving nutrient utilization, enabling greater recovery of proteins, peptides, and bioactive compounds from raw materials and by-products (Yuan et al., 2025). Improving how proteins are processed and utilized may therefore be as important as identifying entirely new protein sources.   Protein Requirements in Dogs and Cats   Protein requirements in companion animals are well established through decades of nutritional research. According to AAFCO guidelines (AAFCO 2026), the minimum protein requirement for adult dogs is approximately 18% on a dry matter basis, while growing puppies require 22.5%. Cats, as obligate carnivores, require higher protein intake, with minimum levels of 26% dry matter.
  In commercial diets, however, protein levels are typically higher. Many dry dog foods contain 22–32% protein, while cat foods often range from 30–40% protein. These levels reflect both nutritional needs and consumer expectations, as protein content has increasingly become associated with perceived diet quality.   Traditional Protein Sources: Still the Foundation   Animal-derived proteins remain central to pet nutrition because of their balanced amino acid profiles and high digestibility. Common ingredients include chicken meals, beef and lamb meals, fish meals, fish protein concentrations, and meat or organ by-products. These ingredients supply essential amino acids, such as lysine, methionine, and taurine and typically exhibit digestibility values around 85–90%, although digestibility can vary depending on the specific ingredient and processing conditions.
  Plant proteins also play a significant role in modern formulations. Ingredients such as soybean meals, pea protein, lentils, and chickpeas contribute valuable amino acids while offering flexibility and cost efficiency in formulation.
  Recent innovations in food processing have further improved plant protein functionality. Technologies such as fermentation, enzymatic hydrolysis, and advanced milling can increase digestibility while reducing anti-nutritional factors such as lectins and protease inhibitors (Yuan et al., 2025).
  These developments highlight an important point: innovation does not always require entirely new ingredients—sometimes it involves improving how existing ingredients are processed and utilized.   The Rise of Fresh and Minimally Processed Meat Ingredients   Over the past decade, the use of fresh meat or poultry has expanded significantly in dry pet food formulations. Many premium kibble products now incorporate fresh chicken, beef, or fish as part of their protein systems.
  In many cases, these fresh ingredients originate from mechanically deboned meat (MDM) or automated meat recovery (AMR) processes, which efficiently recover edible muscle tissue from carcasses after primary cuts have been removed. These ingredients provide highly digestible protein while improving palatability and consumer perception.
  Marketing narratives around 'fresh' ingredients have also been reinforced by the rapid growth of fresh and lightly cooked pet food formats. The fresh pet food market in the United States alone is estimated to exceed USD 3 billion and continues to grow (Packaged Facts, 2023). This trend illustrates how consumer expectations increasingly influence ingredient selection and processing strategies in the pet food industry.   The Rise of Alternative Proteins   While traditional proteins remain dominant, several emerging protein technologies are gaining attention.
  Insect Proteins
Insects, such as black soldier fly larvae, mealworms, and crickets are being explored as sustainable protein sources. Insect meals typically contain 40–65% protein and can be produced using relatively small amounts of land and water compared with conventional livestock production (van Huis, 2021).
  Insect proteins may contain bioactive compounds such as antimicrobial peptides and chitin that could influence immune function and gut health (Gasco et al., 2020). However, scaling production and achieving widespread consumer acceptance remain challenges.   Fermentation-Derived Proteins
Fermentation technologies represent another promising pathway. Microbial fermentation can produce single-cell proteins (SCP) using yeast, bacteria, fungi, or microalgae grown on various substrates (Matassa et al., 2016). These proteins can provide favorable amino acid profiles while requiring relatively small land footprints.
  Traditional fermentation methods—such as koji fermentation using Aspergillus oryzae—can also transform plant substrates into more digestible and nutritionally enhanced ingredients (Yuan et al., 2025). Advances in biotechnology now allow engineered microbes to produce specific peptides or proteins with targeted functional properties.   Cell-Cultured Proteins
Cellular agriculture represents one of the most technologically ambitious approaches to protein production. By culturing animal cells in controlled environments, it may eventually be possible to produce meat without traditional livestock production (Post, 2012). Although promising, this technology is still in its early stages—particularly for pet food applications—and faces challenges related to cost, energy use, and regulatory frameworks.   Protein and the Gut Microbiome
One of the most exciting areas linking protein nutrition and health is the gut microbiome.
  The gut microbiota plays a central role in digestion, immune function, and metabolic health in companion animals. Diet composition—including protein source and digestibility—can significantly influence microbial communities in the gastrointestinal tract (Handl et al., 2013).
  Highly digestible proteins reduce the amount of undigested nitrogen reaching the colon, minimizing the production of undesirable fermentation by-products, such as ammonia or biogenic amines.
  Conversely, certain peptides and amino acids may serve as substrates for beneficial microbial populations, contributing to the production of short-chain fatty acids and other metabolites that support intestinal health (Sandri et al., 2017).   Key Takeaways   The conversation around alternative proteins often frames the issue as a replacement of traditional proteins. Actually, the future of protein in pet nutrition will likely be more integrated and from this discussion, several key insights emerge:
  Traditional protein sources remain nutritionally efficient. Animal and plant proteins continue to provide reliable amino acid nutrition and will remain foundational ingredients in pet food.
  Alternative proteins expand the toolbox; insects, microbial fermentation, and cellular agriculture may complement existing protein systems.
  Processing technology and advances in fermentation, enzymatic modification, and ingredient recovery can improve nutrient utilization, reduce anti-nutritional factors, and enhance the functional value of protein ingredients.
  Consumer expectations are reshaping protein systems. The growth of fresh, minimally processed, and high-protein pet foods illustrates how market trends increasingly influence ingredient selection and processing technologies.
  Ultimately, the goal should not be to replace traditional proteins with alternatives but to develop a diverse and efficient protein ecosystem that supports sustainability, nutrition, and pet health. The key question is not only which proteins we choose, but how intelligently we use them. By Juan Gómez-Basauri, Ph.D. - MAGELLAN LLC
Source: All Pet Food Magazine   References
AAFCO 2026. Association of America Feed Control Officials. Official Publication Boland, M., Rae, A., Vereijken, J., Meuwissen, M. P. M., Fischer, A. R. H., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., Rutherfurd, S. M., Gruppen, H., Moughan, P. J., & Hendriks, W. H. (2013). The future supply of animal-derived protein for human consumption. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 29(1), 62-73.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2012.07.002 FAO. 2018. The future of food and agriculture – Alternative pathways to 2050. Summary version. Rome. 60 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/i8429en FAO. 2022. The future of food and agriculture – Drivers and triggers for transformation. The Future of Food and Agriculture, no. 3. Rome.https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0959en Gasco, L., Gabriele Acuti, Paolo Bani, Antonella Dalle Zotte, Pier Paolo Danieli, Anna De Angelis, Riccardo Fortina, Rosaria Marino, Giuliana Parisi, Giovanni Piccolo, Luciano Pinotti, Aldo Prandini, Achille Schiavone, Genciana Terova, Francesca Tulli & Alessandra Roncarati (2020) Insect and fish by-products as sustainable alternatives to conventional animal proteins in animal nutrition, Italian Journal of Animal Science, 19:1, 360-372.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1828051x.2020.1743209 Handl S., German AJ, Holden SL, Dowd SE, Steiner JM, Heilmann RM, Grant RW, Swanson KS, Suchodolski JS. Faecal microbiota in lean and obese dogs. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013 May;84(2):332-43. Epub 2013 Jan 24. PMID: 23301868.https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12067 Henchion, M. Hayes M, Mullen AM, Fenelon M, Tiwari B. Future Protein Supply and Demand: Strategies and Factors Influencing a Sustainable Equilibrium. Foods. 2017 Jul 20;6(7):53.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5532560/ Matassa, S., Boon N, Pikaar I, Verstraete W. Microbial protein: future sustainable food supply route with low environmental footprint. Microb Biotechnol. 2016 Sep;9(5):568-75. Epub 2016 Jul 8.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4993174/pdf/MBT2-9-568.pdf OECD/FAO 2023. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2023-2032, OECD Publishing, Paris.https://doi.org/10.1787/08801ab7-en. Post MJ. Cultured meat from stem cells: challenges and prospects. Meat Sci. 2012 Nov;92(3):297-301. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 Apr 11. PMID: 22543115.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.008 Sandri, M., Dal Monego S, Conte G, Sgorlon S, Stefanon B. Raw meat-based diet influences fecal microbiome and end products of fermentation in healthy dogs. BMC Vet Res. BMC Vet Res 2017; 13 (1):65.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5331737/ van Huis, A. Prospects of insects as food and feed. Org. Agr. 11, 301–308 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-020-00290-7 Yuan, Yi, Xinyao Wei, Yuhong Mao, Yuxue Zheng, Ni He, Yuan Guo, Ming Wu, Joseph Dumpler, Bing Li, Xu Chen, Xixi Cai, Jianping Wu, Yongqi Tian, Sihan Xie, Jeyamkondan Subbiah, Shaoyun Wang. Innovative Food Processing Technologies Promoting Efficient Utilization of Nutrients in Staple Food Crops, Engineering, Volume 50, 2025, Pages 229-244.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.04.014

Proteins The Protein Matrix: Balancing Formulation, Operational Realities, and Consumer Demands

5+ MIN

The Protein Matrix: Balancing Formulation, Operational Realities, and Consumer Demands

Today, as pets are increasingly humanized and elevated to the status of family members, the scrutiny placed on the ingredients in their bowls has never been higher. This is why, for this edition, I'm taking a different approach from my past articles and decided to write about the most scrutinized, expensive, and dynamic component of any pet food formula: protein.

The true value of a raw material is no longer dictated solely by its price per ton. Instead, it is defined by a complex matrix of nutritional efficacy, marketing appeal, and manufacturing viability. The universe of ingredients is expanding rapidly, introducing alternative proteins, functional extracts, and novel additives. However, to truly understand how these ingredients deliver value, we must examine how the menu of ingredients, including the different protein sources, complement each other in three dimensions: nutrition, consumer trends, and the realities of managing these materials on the factory floor.
Nutrition: How Proteins Complement Each Other
From a purely nutritional standpoint, a pet does not require specific ingredients; it requires specific nutrients. The goal of any formulator is to deliver a complete and balanced amino acid profile, alongside high digestibility and bioavailability, and palatability—because if the pet does not eat the product, all the effort has been done for nothing. Achieving this is rarely accomplished efficiently with a single protein source. Instead, formulation is all about complements.

Traditional animal protein sources, including chicken, beef, fish, and lamb meal, have long been the workhorses of the industry, offering high protein density and excellent palatability. However, they are often complemented with each other and with plant-based options, such as peas, soybeans, potatoes, or corn gluten meal.

Why blend them?  Because what one ingredient lacks, another provides. For instance, plant-based proteins can be highly digestible and lower the overall ash content of the formula, but they may be limited in essential amino acids (methionine or taurine precursors). By strategically pairing it with a marine protein source, such as salmon meal or a functional extract like yeast, a formulator can bridge the amino acid gap while maintaining a specific price point and functional target.

Furthermore, the rise of alternative proteins, including insects, single-cell proteins, and cultivated meats, is altering the formulation landscape. These ingredients are not just novelties; they can offer functional benefits, such as hypoallergenic properties or high levels of antimicrobial peptides. They 'play' within a formula, not just as bulk protein, but as functional additives that elevate the nutritional profile and the true value of the end product.
The Marketing Push: Premiumization and the Clean Label
While formulators focus on amino acids, digestibility, bioavailability, and palatability, the focus of marketing departments and consumers is the ingredient list and the product claims. In today's premium and super-premium segments, communication trends heavily influence product design, sometimes at odds with traditional formulation logic.

The push for 'clean label' products and limited ingredient diets is a prime example.  Higher-value segments are demanding shorter ingredient lists, driven by a consumer perception that fewer ingredients equate to a more natural, wholesome, and transparent product. This creates a significant challenge: how do you deliver a perfectly balanced amino acid profile when your marketing brief restricts you to a single protein source and a single carbohydrate source?

This restriction has driven the industry toward novel proteins. These new ingredients, such as rabbit, kangaroo, wild boar, herring, venison, and duck, are commanding premium prices—they serve a dual purpose. First, they are highly effective for pets with suspected food sensitivity or allergies to common proteins like poultry or beef. Second, they provide a powerful narrative for marketing and communication. Novel proteins instantly differentiate a brand on a crowded retail shelf, communicating exclusivity and premium quality.

However, the true value here also hinges on the traceability of origin. Consumers put value into knowing that the rabbit was sustainably sourced or if the salmon was wild. Traceability has evolved from a supply chain buzzword into a non-negotiable consumer demand and a core pillar of a brand's value proposition. The story behind the ingredient is now just as important as the ingredient itself.
The Factory Floor Reality: Navigating Production Pain Points
A recipe can look perfect on paper and test brilliantly in a consumer focus group, but it must be feasible to manage within an existing manufacturing process. Managing diverse and novel proteins in a high-volume factory introduces pain points that question the concept of "true value."

One of the most persistent challenges is managing the natural variability of raw materials, particularly animal by-product meals. Meat and bone meals, for instance, can vary significantly from batch to batch depending on the rendering process and the exact source materials. A classic factory pain point is color variation. If a specific batch of chicken meal contains a higher concentration of blood, the resulting kibble will be noticeably darker. While the product remains entirely safe and nutritionally sound, this visual inconsistency can inevitably lead to consumer complaints. Pet owners are conditioned to expect absolute uniformity, and a dark batch of kibble is often misinterpreted as burnt or spoiled. Managing this requires strict supplier specifications, advanced mixing techniques, and sometimes, the reluctant use of colorants to standardize the final appearance.

Beyond color, different proteins behave differently during extrusion. Plant proteins often require different specific mechanical energy and moisture inputs compared to animal proteins. High levels of fresh meat, while highly appealing on an ingredient label, introduce massive amounts of water into the formula, which must be managed to ensure the kibble expands properly and dries to a safe moisture level to prevent mold.
Conclusion: Redefining True Value
The universe of pet food ingredients is undoubtedly expanding, but 'true value' is not found simply by adding the newest, trendiest protein to a formula. True value is achieved at the intersection of three distinct disciplines.

It requires the formulator's skill to blend complementary amino acid profiles for optimal animal health. It demands the marketer's insight to select ingredients that resonate with consumer demands for transparency, limited ingredients, and sustainable origins. And crucially, it relies on the factory expertise to handle the physical realities, variabilities, and organoleptic challenges of processing raw materials at scale.

As the industry continues to innovate beyond price, the brands that succeed will be those that master this complex matrix, ensuring that every raw material earns its place in the bowl: nutritionally, commercially, and operationally. By Felipe Martinez R.
Source: All Peto Food Magazine

By Felipe Martínez R.


Palatants

Palatants  Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Predict Pet Food Palatability

2+ MIN

 Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Predict Pet Food Palatability

WHY THIS MATTERS
Palatability is one of the strongest drivers of product success in pet food. Yet, predicting it remains challenging. Development still relies heavily on iterative animal trials, which are time-consuming, costly, and often identify failures late in the process.
  At AFB, we are changing this approach by using artificial intelligence (AI) to predict palatability outcomes before testing. By combining historical data with formulation knowledge, we help transform development from trial-and-error into a more targeted and efficient process.
  THE CHALLENGE
Palatability is the result of multiple interacting factors, including ingredients, inclusion levels, fat systems, processing, and animal variability. These interactions are complex and non-linear, making outcomes difficult to anticipate.
  Because of this complexity, traditional approaches struggle to efficiently explore formulation space and consistently deliver high-performing solution.   A NEW APPROACH: FROM TESTING TO PREDICTING
Instead of relying only on experiments, we integrate data across trials and formulations to identify patterns and predict outcomes.
  Our models transform inputs such as recipe composition, ingredient levels, and processing conditions into clear guidance: which solutions are most likely to succeed and which carry higher risk.
    FROM DATA TO DECISIONS
Our approach converts complex datasets into practical insights that guide development. Rather than focusing only on performance, we also consider how reliable each result is.
  By combining performance with confidence, we generate a clear prioritization of what to test next. This allows teams to focus on the most promising formulations and avoid unnecessary trials.
    WHAT THIS ENABLES

This predictive approach allows us to:
  Identify high-potential solutions earlier Reduce experimental burden Focus on the most impactful ingredients Improve consistency of results
  In practice, large experimental spaces can be narrowed down to a smaller set of high-confidence candidates, accelerating development and improving outcomes.   A SMARTER WAY TO DEVELOP PALATANTS
Artificial intelligence does not replace expertise—it enhances it. Scientific knowledge remains central to interpretation and validation, while predictive models help guide decisions and reduce uncertainty.
  By combining data, science, and AI, we enable a more efficient and confident approach to palatability development. Source: AFB International

Functional Additives <strong>Colmax</strong>: Natural Choline for Neural, Metabolic, and Digestive Well-being in Pets

3+ MIN

Colmax: Natural Choline for Neural, Metabolic, and Digestive Well-being in Pets

In companion animal nutrition, well-being begins long before food reaches the bowl. Ingredient quality and nutrient balance are key factors in sustaining the vitality and metabolic health of dogs and cats.

Among these nutrients, choline plays a fundamental role. Its presence in the diet contributes to proper liver function, lipid transport, and the development of the nervous system. Dogs and cats do not synthesize sufficient amounts on their own, making the inclusion of this ingredient essential.

Colmax is a natural source of choline and inositol developed by Adinnova to help regulate liver, lipid, and energy metabolism. Its plant-based formulation enables this essential nutrient to be incorporated into different pet food formulations in a stable and safe manner.  
Why Is Choline Key in Pet Nutrition?
Choline is involved in fundamental physiological processes, particularly liver metabolism, fat transport, and nervous system function. When dietary intake is insufficient, liver disorders, reduced vitality, or muscle weakness may occur.

Traditionally, the most widely used source of choline in animal nutrition has been choline chloride. However, this molecule presents certain technological limitations. It is a hygroscopic and reactive compound that can interact with other dietary ingredients, affecting the stability of sensitive nutrients during feed processing and storage. Among the most common effects are the oxidation of vitamins, pigments, and amino acids. Moreover, its origin is associated with petrochemical byproducts.

Natural sources of choline represent an alternative aimed at overcoming these limitations. Plant-based choline is associated with phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholine, which are in the cellular membrane structure and contribute to its biological stability.
Adinnova's Natural Choline
Adinnova's source of choline and inositol, Colmax, was developed to contribute to metabolic balance in animal nutrition. Its formulation combines plant-based choline with functional compounds that support cellular performance.

Its components include phospholipids, such as phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylinositol, as well as coadjuvants, for example, butyric acid and plant extracts, that support intestinal and liver health and nutrient absorption. This combination helps optimize lipid transport and utilization, helping metabolic balance and pet vitality through nutrition.

Another relevant characteristic is its technological stability. Colmax is a fluid, non-hygroscopic presentation that withstands the thermal treatments commonly used in pet food processing, as these molecules remain active and maintain absorption capacity. In turn, its use allows lower inclusion levels in the formula compared with synthetic choline sources, optimizing formulation efficiency and economic performance.
The Impact of Colmax in Pet Care
Colmax provides choline, a pseudovitamin that dogs and cats do not synthesize in sufficient amounts. Its presence in the diet helps reinforce the integrity of cell membranes and participate in neurometabolic processes linked to vitality and normal body function.

This nutritional additive supports the healthy development of the brain, heart, liver, muscles, and nervous system, contributing to the overall well-being of animals through nutrition.

Its stable formulation also allows easy incorporation into pet food. The recommended dosage in pet care ranges from 150 to 500 g/ton of feed, and it can replace choline chloride (60%) at an approximate ratio of 1-4, optimizing the use of space in the diet.

By supporting cellular function, Colmax helps sustain the vitality and well-being of dogs and cats throughout all life stages. Its nutritional contribution reinforces cell membrane integrity, supports neuronal development, and contributes to pets' overall health.
Studies on Colmax
This biosolution has been supported by scientific evaluations aimed at understanding its effect on animal metabolism. During 2024 and 2025, Adinnova carried out studies in collaboration with the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) to analyze productive, metabolic, and physiological parameters, including performance, liver function, and tissue analysis. The results validated the contribution of Colmax as a nutritional additive that supports the general well-being of animals.  
Gene expression studies were also conducted using advanced sequencing technologies to observe how the organism responds to its inclusion in the diet. Analyses have shown that Colmax modulates several metabolic pathways linked to nutrient utilization and cellular energy production.

Lower activation of genes associated with cell proliferation processes was observed. When dysregulated, these mechanisms are often linked to different pathologies, including tumor processes such as cancer. In other words, Colmax supports an active and balanced metabolism without stimulating cellular mechanisms associated with uncontrolled proliferation. By Adinnova
Source: All Pet Food Magazine

About Adinnova
Adinnova is an Argentine company, present in international markets, dedicated to the development of natural additives for animal nutrition. Each biosolution integrates science and innovation applied to wellbeing and productivity.

More information on our website: adinnova.com.ar
 

Advertising

260x430 260x430 260x430 260x430 260x95